About the Journal

 

JURNAL INTEGRASI AKUNTANSI DAN BISNIS is a scholarly journal that focuses on the dissemination of research and knowledge in the fields of economics, accounting, and business. Jurnal Integrasi Akuntansi dan Bisnis (JIANIS) is a peer-reviewed journal, which is published twice a year in January-Juni, and July-December with the registered ISSN (Online): 3063-7031. JIANIS contributes to improving the theory and practice by promoting high-quality applied and theoretical research. It publishes original works in various areas of business including economics, accounting, business, finance, and management. The Journal welcomes original research papers using archival, case, experimental, field, survey or any other relevant empirical metho. JURNAL INTEGRASI AKUNTANSI DAN BISNIS is under management Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economic Bussines and Information Technology, University Bina Sehat PPNI Mojokerto, Indonesia. JURNAL INTEGRASI AKUNTANSI DAN BISNIS published Department of Research and Social Engagement University of Bina Sehat PPNI Mojokerto, Indonesia. Jl. Raya Jabon Km. 06 Mojoanyar Mojokerto. Telp/Fax.0321-390 203 | Email: lppmstikesbinasehatppni@gmail.com |

FOCUS AND SCOPE

Jurnal Integrasi Akuntansi dan Bisnis (JIANIS) is a peer-reviewed journal. JIANIS invites academics and researchers who do original research in the fields of economics, accounting, business and management, including but not limited to:

Economics

  • - Monetary Economics, Finance, and Banking
  • - International Economics
  • - Public Economics
  • - Economic development
  • - Regional Economy
  • - Accounting

Financial Accounting and Stock Market

  • - Management accounting and Behavioural Accounting
  • - Auditing
  • - Accounting information system
  • - Taxation and Public Sector Accounting
  • - Shariah Accounting
  • - Business and Management
  • Financial management
  • - Marketing
  • - Entrepreneurship
  • - Human Resource Management
  • - International Business

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

-    The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).

-    The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format.

-    Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.

-    The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.

-    The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which is found in About the Journal.

-    If submitting to a peer-reviewed section of the journal, the instructions in Ensuring a Blind Review have been followed.

 

 

AUTHOR GUIDELINES

Articles sent to JIANIS should follow the guidelines stated below:

Article files should be provided in Microsoft Word format, and are not allowed to send files in PDF format. The manuscript is written using Times New Roman, A4 paper format, margins: top 3; left 3.5; right 3; bottom 3, justified, and one space. Cover page should state the titles and author’s affiliation. The titles typed in single space, Times New Roman fonts 12 font size,  Bold. Author typed in   Times New Roman fonts 12 font size,  Bold and Italic. Email address and Author’s affiliation typed in Times New Roman fonts 12 font size, Italic.

 

The article should systematically cover:

Abstract to include purpose/ research problem(s), objective(s), method, findings and contributions. Abstract should consist of 150-350 words (in English and Indonesian). Abstract is followed by at least Three keywords. Abstract and keyword in two language: English and Indonesian. Abstract should be typed in one space, Times New Roman 12 and Italic.

Introduction to include research motivation(s), background, research question(s) and research objective(s).

Theoretical Framework and Hypothesis Development (if present) to explain the theoretical framework used as the logical basis to develop hypothesis or research proposition and research model.

Research Methods to describe data selection and collection approach, measurement and operational variable definition and data analysis method.

Conclusion, Implication and Limitation to provide the summary of research findings, implications and suggestions for future research.

References only references cited in the paper that may be stated in this part and all cited references should be stated here.

Chicago style or accounting review style is used as a reference in citation, references, and writing format. 

JIANIS style .

Appendix consist of tables, pictures and research instrument.

 

 

PUBLICATION ETHICS

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Jurnal Integrasi Akuntansi dan Bisnis (JIANIS) is a blind-reviewed journal published periodically twice a year (Juny and November). JEBI publishes original research articles, review articles and case studies focused on economics, accounting, business, and management which has neither been published elsewhere in any languages nor is it under review for publication anywhere. This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the editors, authors, and peer-reviewer. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Duties of Editors

Publication decisions. Editors are responsible to take into consideration on the process of decision with regard to articles submitted to the Journal. Editors should be in accordance with the guidelines and policies of the Journal and constrained by ethical and legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, plagiarism, and copyrights infringement. The editor may confer other editors or reviewers in making publication decisions based on research fields.

Fair play. An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality. The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions. Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity. Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards. Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention. Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism. The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication. An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects. If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest. All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works. When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

 

All manuscripts submitted to this journal undergo a selection and assessment process by the Editorial Board members. The journal applies this process as the preliminary selection to determine whether the manuscripts have conformed to the submission guidelines of the journal, including the writing guideline, focus, and scope, and that they are of excellent academic quality. Manuscripts that have conformed such criteria, and if they are judged suitable for this publication, will be peer-reviewed.

Desk Review. At the desk review stage, the examination of manuscripts is to ensure that they have met the writing guideline, focus, and scope with excellent academic quality. If they do not meet these conditions, the authors will get feedback, and they will have an opportunity to revise their manuscript according to the given criteria. However, there is also the possibility that the Editorial Board will directly reject the manuscript.

Double-blind Peer Review. The review process applies the double-blind peer review method, in which case neither authors nor reviewers know each other’s identities. When the manuscript has passed the desk review stage, editors will deliver manuscripts to 2 (two) reviewers who are experts in the field of the submitted manuscript. The task of reviewers is to assess originality, clarity of presentation, contribution to the field/science. The final decision of manuscript acceptance is solely decided by the editors according to reviewers' comments. Typically, reviewers will do the review process within three weeks. Manuscripts that did not successfully pass the desk review process will not proceed to this stage.

Reviewer’s Decision. The reviewers will provide the following recommendations:

  1. Accepted – the manuscript is acceptable for publication.
  2. Accepted with minor revisions – the manuscript is acceptable for publication after it undergoes a revision in response to the reviewers’ concerns.
  3. Accepted with major revisions – substantive inadequacies in the manuscript, such as data analysis, the main theory used and rewriting of paragraphs, need to be revised); or
  4. Rejected (the manuscript is not acceptable for publication, or the given reviews relate to fundamental issues).

The final decision of manuscript acceptance is solely decided by the Editorial Board by taking into account reviewers' comments.

Revision Stage. Once the manuscript has been received with notations of minor or major revisions, it will be returned to the author with a review summary form. For manuscripts accepted with major revisions, authors are allotted two weeks to revise. Whereas for manuscripts accepted with minor revisions, one week is allotted for revision. When returning the revised manuscript, the author is required to fill in and attach the review summary form.

Final Decision. At this stage, the manuscript will be re-evaluated by the Editorial Board to ensure that the author has revised in response to the reviewers’ concerns. In this final decision, the manuscript may still be rejected if the author did not seriously conduct the revisions necessary.

Proofread. Once the manuscript has been deemed acceptable by the Editorial Board, it will undergo a proofreading process to maintain linguistic quality.

Publication Confirmation. At this stage, the final layout of the manuscript will be resent to the author to ensure that the content follows the author’s writing. At this stage, the author may revise any typographical error found in the final manuscript. Once confirmation from the author is given, the Editorial Secretary will process the manuscript for online publication on the website as well as a print publication.

The process from submission until publication approximately takes 6 weeks.

 

SCREENING FOR PLAGIARISM POLICY

  1. Papers submitted to Jurnal Integrasi Akuntansi dan Bisnis (JIANIS) will be screened for plagiarism using Turnitin plagiarism detection tools. JIANIS will immediately reject papers leading to plagiarism or self-plagiarism.
  2. Before submitting articles to reviewers, those are first checked for similarity/plagiarism tool, by a member of the editorial team. The papers submitted to JIANIS must have similarity level less than 20%.
  3. Plagiarism is the exposing of another person’s thoughts or words as though they were your own, without without permission, credit, or acknowledgment, or because of failing to cite the sources properly.

 

ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGES (APCs)

The Article Submission is free of charge. Authors are not required to pay an Article Submission Fee as part of the submission process to contribute to review costs. Article Processing Charges (APCs) are levied when your manuscript is editorially accepted and before publication.

Authors pay a one-time APC to cover the costs of peer review administration and management, professional production of articles in PDF and other formats. There are no charges for rejected articles, no submission charges, and no surcharges based on the length of an article, figures, or supplementary data.

Article Publication Fee: 150,000 (IDR)